From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr'" <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: fake vs real CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW |
Date: | 2002-02-26 10:19:20 |
Message-ID: | FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB1047615@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr]
> Sent: 26 February 2002 09:28
> To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] fake vs real CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW
>
>
> Le Mardi 26 Février 2002 09:40, Dave Page a écrit :
> > Yes. I thought I suggested adding a warning to that effect at one
> > time.
> You are right. We could query using existing views with ILIKE
> %view_bar% and
> issue a warning if some view matches, but this wron't fix the
> broblem. We
> need CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW... CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER is
> not really
> needed...
>
> > How's the ALTER VIEW patch coming along btw?
> Do you mean issuing a warning?
No, you were looking at a list of issues I had. I haven't had a chance to
check the code yet - you may have already committed it.
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2002-02-26 10:30:25 | Re: Database->ServerEncoding, ClientEncoding |
Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-02-26 09:43:30 | Re: Database->ServerEncoding, ClientEncoding |