On Apr 11, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Sorry, yes, I'm behind on email... :(
> If MD5 values will be your primary data and you'll be storing millions
> of them, it would be wise to create your own datatype and operators
> the most compact and efficient representation possible.
If you do this *please* post it. I really think it would be worth
while for us to have fixed-size data types for common forms of binary
data; MD5, SHA1 and SHA256 come to mind.
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Decibel!||Date: 2008-05-24 17:55:15|
|Subject: Re: shared_buffers performance |
|Previous:||From: Andrzej Zawadzki||Date: 2008-05-24 16:49:52|
|Subject: Re: Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron?|