Re: Is the Windows Version Stable?

From: "SHELTON,MICHAEL (Non-HP-Boise,ex1)" <michael_shelton(at)non(dot)hp(dot)com>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: joe(at)jwebmedia(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is the Windows Version Stable?
Date: 2001-12-21 19:26:02
Message-ID: FB60DFB2C0E24449AC0C21F743B935410150F878@xboi02.boi.hp.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ahh...good point. I certainly wouldn't either. This is for an integration
tool in our development environment. More along the lines of "handy" than
"critical".

Thanks,

Mike

PS As a side note would you want your payroll data on a PostgreSQL
database?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:20 PM
To: SHELTON,MICHAEL (Non-HP-Boise,ex1)
Cc: joe(at)jwebmedia(dot)com; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Is the Windows Version Stable?

"SHELTON,MICHAEL (Non-HP-Boise,ex1)" <michael_shelton(at)non(dot)hp(dot)com> writes:
> Why do you not recommend it as a reliable setup?

Mainly because cygwin is still a work in progress; and by all reports
NT is a less stable/secure platform than Unixen, even without the
additional stability risks from adding the cygwin layer.

If it works for you, great. But I'd not want to see my payroll data
kept in it ;-)

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-21 19:31:11 Re: Is the Windows Version Stable?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-21 19:19:38 Re: Is the Windows Version Stable?