Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: "Vianen, Jeroen van" <jeroen(dot)van(dot)vianen(at)satama(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-18 08:20:30
Message-ID: F9926D32A30ED511B8E30050044AB52E1014AE@ams010.satama.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Cramer [mailto:Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 03:17
> To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] [PATCHES] Ant configuration
> 
> 
> Given that ant is (or is becoming) the defacto standard for building
> java apps I am reluctant to remove it. A number of projects simply
> include the ant jar in the download. 

And why not include the postgresql.jar in the download as well? Problem
solved for most people. Preferably even separate jar files for jdbc1 and
jdbc2.

I vote for keeping ant support as well.


Jeroen

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: rootDate: 2001-10-18 14:26:59
Subject: problem with Chinese
Previous:From: Kovács PéterDate: 2001-10-18 08:15:37
Subject: Re: JDBC 2 ResultSet and cursors

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group