Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re:

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2004-10-28 15:16:50
Message-ID: F80E2DAF94C32A5A82B8EFB0@sparkey.oopsware.intra (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
--On Dienstag, Oktober 26, 2004 23:44:10 +0300 Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> 
wrote:

>
> Thus I think that reserved keyword is what it is meant to be in the
> first place ;)

Yes, that was my intention, too. That's because i went straight forward and 
put it in the reserved keyword list and didn't spent time on playing around 
with it as a non-reserved keyword. I expect somebody wouldn't agree with 
this, since it will break things if somebody has something odd like

CREATE VIEW vblabla
AS
  SELECT
    *
  FROM
    FOO AS WITH;

-- 

  Bernd

In response to

  • Re: at 2004-10-26 20:44:10 from Hannu Krosing

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: ohpDate: 2004-10-28 15:38:23
Subject: Re: Unixware 714 pthreads
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-28 14:39:06
Subject: Re: pg_get_serial_sequence is inconsistent

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group