A friend of mine built 8.1.2 today on an Intel transition kit Mac and
he said it built and make check worked perfectly. Hopefully that
means the database will work. I'm sure it will.
Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brendan(at)clickspace(dot)com
ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
On Jan 11, 2006, at 4:23 AM, Sean Davis wrote:
> On 1/11/06 2:13 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Brendan Duddridge <brendan(at)clickspace(dot)com> writes:
>>> Does anyone know if PostgreSQL 8.1.x will work on the new Intel
>> If it doesn't, send a patch ;-)
>> We work fine on Intel hardware, and on Darwin, so I'd expect at most
>> very minor issues getting it to work on Darwin/Intel. But I can't
>> that this is a trail not yet blazed.
> Isn't PostgreSQL used by the newest versions of the system
> (10.4.x)? If not
> by default, it is available for some extensions, I think. See here:
> So, I think apple may have an interest in making sure that it does
> work, but
> I'm WAY outside the thought processes of large computer companies.
> ---------------------------(end of
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
In response to
pgsql-novice by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-01-12 03:21:40|
|Subject: Re: Sequential Scans On Complex Query With UNION - see why this fails |
|Previous:||From: Michael Glaesemann||Date: 2006-01-11 23:37:35|
|Subject: Re: Sequential Scans On Complex Query With UNION - see why this fails|