Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Suggestion: Which Binary?

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Suggestion: Which Binary?
Date: 2006-04-25 15:57:11
Message-ID: F7E0FDF3-6E10-47FD-9A4A-08B7A74E4400@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Apr 25, 2006, at 08:19, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I have applied the attached patch, and updated descriptions for the
> items you were uncertain of.  I didn't add defaults for some of
> the more unusual entries, but just left them blank.

Cool, thank you, Bruce.

Best,

David

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-04-25 16:48:04
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes
Previous:From: Ben ClewettDate: 2006-04-25 15:53:32
Subject: Installation on Duel-Core Pentium XP

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-04-25 20:47:42
Subject: Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-04-25 15:27:07
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Implementing RESET CONNECTION ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group