Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Larry Rosenman" <lrosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
>>>> I'd like to see a more concrete definition of what we
>>>> want Autovacuum to output and at what levels.
>> Should we call it autovacuum_messages?
>> In current usage...
>> _verbosity controls how much information each message gives
>> _messages controls what types of messages are logged
> That probably works, but I'm not sure about the one to add the VERBOSE
> to the
> VACUUM commands autovacuum.c emits.
does the following options satisfy everyone:
none silent (nothing output at LOG level)
database we'd output a LOG message processing database <name>
table we'd output a LOG message for each table we actually vacuum /
verbose we'd add the verbose flag to each command
the lower levels would include the upper (I.E. verbose implies table +
If this is acceptable, I'm going to start working on the code to
Database Support Engineer
PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC.
12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY
AUSTIN TX 78727-6531
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Teodor Sigaev||Date: 2006-04-28 16:11:26|
|Subject: Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3.|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-04-28 15:53:05|
|Subject: Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. |