Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Windows max concurrent connections

From: "Benjamin Krajmalnik" <kraj(at)illumen(dot)com>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>,"Mario Ferloni" <m(dot)ferloni(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows max concurrent connections
Date: 2008-04-04 01:39:11
Message-ID: F4E6A2751A2823418A21D4A160B689880E966E@fletch.stackdump.local (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
Assuming he is using ODBC to connect, I do not believe the current ODBC
driver supports connection pooling.
My experience was that it did not.  I posted a question on the ODBC
list, but have not yet received a reply.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org 
> [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Scott Marlowe
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 10:47 AM
> To: Mario Ferloni
> Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Windows max concurrent connections
> 
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Mario Ferloni 
> <m(dot)ferloni(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >  I am a bit concerned about the max concurrent connection problem  
> > documented in the windows faq  
> > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_windows.html#4.4), 
> that is  
> > due to user32.dll limitations. Now, my question is: what is 
> the status  
> > of this problem as of 8.3.1 version?
> 
> Have you looked into connection pooling?
> 
> --
> Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list 
> (pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org) To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
> 

In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Duan LigongDate: 2008-04-04 02:35:32
Subject: store different tables in different locations
Previous:From: Robert LorDate: 2008-04-03 17:27:35
Subject: Re: Postgres and SUN

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group