Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: json api WIP patch

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch
Date: 2013-02-01 00:16:12
Message-ID: F2E3D046-5FA1-4D84-B395-F4B559AEBE28@justatheory.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

> I'm happy to take opinions about this, and I expected some bikeshedding, but your reaction is contrary to everything others have told me. Mostly they love the operators.
> 
> I guess that '~>' and '~>>' would work as well as '->' and '->>'.

Or +> and +>>, since ~ is set very high and small by some fonts (where the fontmakers though of it as a kind of superscript character).

I suppose that := is out of the question?

Best,

David



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2013-02-01 00:26:58
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-02-01 00:12:03
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group