RE: [GENERAL] My further experiences with ecpg

From: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
To: Memphisto <szoli(at)valerie(dot)inf(dot)elte(dot)hu>
Cc: PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] My further experiences with ecpg
Date: 1998-10-08 16:48:33
Message-ID: F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F45FE9F@cpsmail
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Hi,

I found out that I didn't have an exec sql commit at the and of the
program. With that finally psql does know about the table(pgacces still
doesn't).
A question: can this ecpg stuff be used for developing PostgreSQL
applications or shall I forget it go to use libpq?

Thanks in advance

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-=
-------
Sebesty=E9n Zolt=E1n AKA Memphisto It all seems so stupid,
it makes me want to give up.=20
szoli(at)neumann(dot)cs(dot)elte(dot)hu But why should I give up,
when it all seems so stupid?=20

MAKE INSTALL NOT WAR And please avoid Necrosoft
Widows

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Terry Mackintosh 1998-10-08 18:06:00 Re: [ADMIN] RE: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/doc/src/sgml protocol.sgml'
Previous Message Jackson, DeJuan 1998-10-08 16:29:23 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/doc/src/sgml protocol.sgml'