Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [HACKERS] RE: [QUESTIONS] The Complete and Ccomprehensive list of Newbie qu

From: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
To: ocie(at)paracel(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] RE: [QUESTIONS] The Complete and Ccomprehensive list of Newbie qu
Date: 1998-03-17 02:14:09
Message-ID: F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F18ECB5@dal_cps.cpsgroup.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Looks sort of like our procedural language, except that instead of
> having a "pool" of functions, functions can be "member functions" of a
> class.  In order to do this "all the way", it seems like we will need
> all instances to appear in their parent classes -- Select
> people.average_age() should hit all instances of people, even those
> that have been subclassed into teachers, police, lawyers, etc.
> 
> Ocie Mitchell
Agreed.  I meant member functions.  But I wouldn't take away the global
pool of functions either.  This satisfies my since of OOP.

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-03-17 02:35:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] datetime default 'now' broken?
Previous:From: ocieDate: 1998-03-17 01:58:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [QUESTIONS] The Complete and Ccomprehensive list of Newbie qu

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group