> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> 
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> >> Special handling of TOAST relations during VACUUM. TOAST relations
> >> are vacuumed while the lock on the master table is still active.
> 
> > It seems very dangerous to me.
> > When VACUUM of a master table was finished, the transaction is
> > in already committed state in many cases. 
> 
> I don't see the problem.  If the toast table doesn't get vacuumed,
> no real harm is done other than failing to recover space.
> 

Hmm,is there any good reason to vacuum toast table in the 
transaction which was already internally committed by vacuum
of the master table ?  Is it possible under WAL ?

Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

• Re: pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) at 2000-12-09 15:52:05 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) at 2000-12-09 23:58:01 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2000-12-09 23:46:23
	Subject: Re: Re: CRC
Previous:	From: mlw	Date: 2000-12-09 22:30:46
	Subject: Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: momjian	Date: 2000-12-09 23:25:53
	Subject: pgsql/doc (TODO)
Previous:	From: momjian	Date: 2000-12-09 22:59:26
	Subject: pgsql/doc/src/sgml (sql.sgml)