Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Bo?ena Potempa" <Bozena(dot)Potempa(at)otc(dot)pl>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?
Date: 2002-11-19 14:35:32
Message-ID: EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJGEHGJMAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bo?ena Potempa [mailto:Bozena(dot)Potempa(at)otc(dot)pl]
> 
> Hiroshi,
> 
> > >Which version of PostgreSQL server are you connecting ?
> >> 
> >> 7.2.3.
> >
> >I can't your case in 7.2.3 but in 7.2.1 the result is
> >  0 0 0 not 0 1 0.
> 
> It is more complicated then I thought.
> I have 2 test installations of PostgreSQL: one on Linux
> and the second one on Windows NT, both 7.2.3 version.
> The Linux installation works with 0 stored in varchar
> field (the test results are as described in my previous 
> e-mail). The Windows installation does not support zeroes
> in strings! 

Hmm the difference may come from (non-)multibyte mode.

> Now I am not sure which behaviour is correct (and planned
> by PostgreSQL developers).

As far as I see PostgreSQL couldn't handle non-null-terminated
strings correctly. 

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2002-11-19 14:50:22
Subject: Re: FATAL 1: Sorry, too many clients already
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-11-19 14:04:10
Subject: Re: Increase inactivity timeout

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group