Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ...

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ...
Date: 2002-01-05 23:59:34
Message-ID: EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJAEPNGFAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > ExecProcNode doesn't return unless
> > it finds a tuple which satisfies the qualification.
> 
> Oh, of course you are right.  I guess there should be
> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in the per-tuple loops of nodeSeqscan.c
> and nodeIndexscan.c, as well.  Joins should be okay, since they
> get their inputs from lower-level ExecProcNode calls.

Now I realize that 7.1 already changed the handling of 
die interrupts fundamentally. For example we can't kill
the backend which is in a trouble with an infinite loop.
Was it an intended change ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-01-06 00:25:38
Subject: Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ...
Previous:From: barryDate: 2002-01-05 22:26:24
Subject: pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql jdbc1 ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group