> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > ExecProcNode doesn't return unless
> > it finds a tuple which satisfies the qualification.
> 
> Oh, of course you are right.  I guess there should be
> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in the per-tuple loops of nodeSeqscan.c
> and nodeIndexscan.c, as well.  Joins should be okay, since they
> get their inputs from lower-level ExecProcNode calls.

Now I realize that 7.1 already changed the handling of 
die interrupts fundamentally. For example we can't kill
the backend which is in a trouble with an infinite loop.
Was it an intended change ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

• Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ... at 2002-01-05 07:20:28 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ... at 2002-01-06 00:25:38 from Tom Lane

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2002-01-06 00:25:38
	Subject: Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ...
Previous:	From: barry	Date: 2002-01-05 22:26:24
	Subject: pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql jdbc1 ...