From: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:10 PM, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> This question may be appropriate for pgsql-general, but let me ask here
>> because the only relevant discussion seems to have been done on
>> Can pg_trgm support non-alphanumeric characters by undefining
>> in contrib/pg_trgm/trgm.h?
> Yes unless I'm missing something.
Then, does it make sense to remove "#define KEEPONLYALNUM" in 9.1.4? Would
it cause any problems? If no, I wish that, because it eliminates the need to
do the removal every time the users applies minor releases.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Joe Conway||Date: 2012-05-09 22:36:03|
|Subject: Re: memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-05-09 22:08:36|
|Subject: Re: memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1 |