Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Can pg_trgm handle non-alphanumeric characters?

From: "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can pg_trgm handle non-alphanumeric characters?
Date: 2012-05-09 22:17:35
Message-ID: EDD9E3244A6F43A68304F76CE48937E1@maumau (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:10 PM, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> This question may be appropriate for pgsql-general, but let me ask here
>> because the only relevant discussion seems to have been done on
>> pgsql-hackers:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-09/msg00169.php
>>
>> Can pg_trgm support non-alphanumeric characters by undefining 
>> KEEPONLYALNUM
>> in contrib/pg_trgm/trgm.h?
>
> Yes unless I'm missing something.

Then, does it make sense to remove "#define KEEPONLYALNUM" in 9.1.4? Would 
it cause any problems? If no, I wish that, because it eliminates the need to 
do the removal every time the users applies minor releases.


Regards
MauMau



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2012-05-09 22:36:03
Subject: Re: memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-05-09 22:08:36
Subject: Re: memory leak regression 9.1 versus 8.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group