Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Ultimate DB Server

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Mike Rogers" <temp6453(at)hotmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jean-Michel POURE" <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: Ultimate DB Server
Date: 2001-10-29 02:40:20
Message-ID: ECEHIKNFIMMECLEBJFIGOEFOCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Doh! I messed up my example!

The first table was supposed to be transactional.

> I don't get how you can have different tables being transactional in your
> database??
> 
> ie. What on earth does this do? (pseudo)
> 
create table blah transactional;
> create table hum not_transactional;
> 
> begin;
> insert into blah values (1);
> insert into hum values (2);
> rollback;
> 
> ?????

Chris


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: bpalmerDate: 2001-10-29 02:52:50
Subject: Re: Ultimate DB Server
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-10-29 02:18:31
Subject: Re: HISTORY file

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: bpalmerDate: 2001-10-29 02:52:50
Subject: Re: Ultimate DB Server
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2001-10-29 01:52:35
Subject: Re: Ultimate DB Server

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: bpalmerDate: 2001-10-29 02:52:50
Subject: Re: Ultimate DB Server
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2001-10-29 01:52:35
Subject: Re: Ultimate DB Server

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group