Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4

From: decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Jignesh K(dot) Shah <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: 2009-03-14 15:22:38
Message-ID: ECA14EA0-C309-4F06-A4B3-2A19D5126474@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mar 12, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
>> Something that might be useful for him to report is the avg number
>> of active backends for each data point ...
> short of doing select * from pg_stat_activity and removing the IDLE
> entries, any other clean way to get that information.

Uh, isn't there a DTrace probe that would provide that info? It
certainly seems like something you'd want to know...
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message decibel 2009-03-14 15:27:01 Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Previous Message decibel 2009-03-14 15:06:08 Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4