On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Well, fair enough I suppose. Or it would be if you gave me an
> alternative that provides a simpler way to support those 3 upgrades.
I did: a naming convention with upgrade scripts that have the version number in them. You rejected it.
> Of course if that's too much for you, you can also choose to only
> support upgrades one versions at a time and provide only two scripts.
> Note also that I don't recall of any proposal on the table that would
> help with that situation, so I'm all ears.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-02-02 17:10:59|
|Subject: Re: Optimize PL/Perl function argument passing [PATCH]|
|Previous:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2011-02-02 17:03:07|
|Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3|