Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Date: 2006-04-01 01:09:36
Message-ID: E974F21E-FC85-4DAF-B6B3-E94040FC094D@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Mar 31, 2006, at 15:52, Tom Lane wrote:

> The more usual way to handle this sort of thing is to put each version
> of perl in a different directory, and then you can alter PATH while
> running configure to pick which one you want. I've got several
> versions
> of perl on this machine that I select that way ... it doesn't require
> any special smarts on the part of the perl-using program, and it
> scales
> to handle multiple versions of other things like Tcl, too.

I would normally do that, as well, but in this case, I wanted my self-
compiled Perl to always be what runs (as a general rule), so I had it
hard link itself in /usr/bin as well as /usr/local/bin. It is only in
this one case where I need the stock Perl to be found that things get
wonky for me. :-)

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Wheeler 2006-04-01 01:11:04 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-01 00:01:18 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Wheeler 2006-04-01 01:11:04 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-01 00:01:18 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?