Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming

Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

The world's most advanced open source database.

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From:	"David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To:	Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc:	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date:	2010-01-29 19:57:09
Message-ID:	E91DF725-9ACF-4B01-A0F5-81294C1D08B3@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

On Jan 29, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> With the release of Postgres 9.0, should we consider changing the
> default for 'standard_conforming_strings'?

+1

David

In response to

PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings at 2010-01-29 19:51:53 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next: From: Andrew Dunstan Date: 2010-01-29 20:00:09

Subject: odd output in initdb

Previous: From: Kevin Grittner Date: 2010-01-29 19:55:34

Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

Next:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2010-01-29 20:00:09
	Subject: odd output in initdb
Previous:	From: Kevin Grittner	Date: 2010-01-29 19:55:34
	Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

Search

Peripheral Links

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date