> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ludek Finstrle [mailto:luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz]
> Sent: 21 December 2005 11:53
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Next development steps?
> > OK, so to get things moving, I think we should look to
> release a stable
> > version (08.01.0200) as soon as possible, and then branch a
> stable version
> > from that. Are there any outstanding issues to
> resolve/commit before we can
> > think about doing that? The only one I can think of is
> Tom's 64bit concerns
> > which I really think we need to fix first, but requires a
> suitable machine
> > to properly test on of course.
> I don't think release have to wait for this one.
I do, because Tom will be needing a good release for inclusion in FC5,
otherwise it may end up being rolled back to an 07.xx release if he
thinks the problem is too risky to release (which it sounds like he
> There are known bugs:
> - report for sqlstate (1000495) - I try to solve it now.
> + 1 waiting
> - SEGFAULT during SQLCancel (1000475)
> + 0 waiting
> - private announce about problems with Text larger than X bytes
> + 1 waiting
> I don't know what all you want to give into new release.
Not sure what you mean?
> There is also two cleanup patches after psqlodbc-8.01.0105 which isn't
> tested by users. I think we can't apply these cleanup patches to
> stable version. It show us a little bit more backend_tuples behaviour.
OK, I'm not worried about cleanups as long as it is as bug-free as
pgsql-odbc by date
|Next:||From: noreply||Date: 2005-12-21 12:36:10|
|Subject: [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000495 ] duplicate key causes HY000 SQL-State|
|Previous:||From: Ludek Finstrle||Date: 2005-12-21 11:53:03|
|Subject: Re: Next development steps?|