| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Schema bug |
| Date: | 2005-12-09 08:21:08 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E7F2@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian G. Pflug [mailto:fgp(at)phlo(dot)org]
> Sent: 09 December 2005 01:15
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Andreas Pflug; pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Schema bug
>
> Hm.. couldn't it check the system-schemas by name instead - so, saying
> "it's a non-system schema if it isn't called information_schema or
> pg_catalog", instead of "it's a system-schema if oid <
> LAST_SYSTEM_OID
> and name is not public"? Or are there other system schemas I
> don't know
> of (quite possible ;-) )?
Probably - but it's more of a future-proofing kinda thing. Pretty weak
argument though...
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | svn | 2005-12-09 08:52:23 | SVN Commit by dpage: r4809 - branches/REL-1_4_0_PATCHES/pgadmin3/i18n/fr_FR |
| Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2005-12-09 01:14:50 | Re: Schema bug |