Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Registry

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: "Miha Radej" <miha(dot)radej(at)siix(dot)com>,<pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Registry
Date: 2005-11-11 16:55:47
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7DF94@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de] 
> Sent: 11 November 2005 16:51
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Miha Radej; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: Registry
> 
> > I'm not convinced it was actually worth the change - it's 
> not like it
> >  was something that the user needed to hack normally, or 
> would cause 
> > performance issues.
> 
> If you add a schema restriction you'll understand why I did this. 

Ahh, yes, I see!

> Alternatively, we could try to convince Tom to extend pg_database and 
> pg_schema :-)

Err, yuh. You go ahead...

:-)

/D

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: svnDate: 2005-11-11 17:42:43
Subject: SVN Commit by andreas: r4737 - in trunk/pgadmin3: . src/include src/utils
Previous:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2005-11-11 16:50:38
Subject: Re: Registry

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group