| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | "Miha Radej" <miha(dot)radej(at)siix(dot)com>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Registry |
| Date: | 2005-11-11 16:55:47 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7DF94@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 11 November 2005 16:51
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Miha Radej; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: Registry
>
> > I'm not convinced it was actually worth the change - it's
> not like it
> > was something that the user needed to hack normally, or
> would cause
> > performance issues.
>
> If you add a schema restriction you'll understand why I did this.
Ahh, yes, I see!
> Alternatively, we could try to convince Tom to extend pg_database and
> pg_schema :-)
Err, yuh. You go ahead...
:-)
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | svn | 2005-11-11 17:42:43 | SVN Commit by andreas: r4737 - in trunk/pgadmin3: . src/include src/utils |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-11-11 16:50:38 | Re: Registry |