| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Scot Loach" <sloach(at)sandvine(dot)com>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Anoop Kumar" <anoopk(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: notice handler in libpq-based driver |
| Date: | 2005-09-07 15:09:10 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC9F3B@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 07 September 2005 15:49
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Scot Loach; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org; Anoop Kumar
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] notice handler in libpq-based driver
>
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > No, I'm not sure how to handle this either - the old driver
> handled it
> > in the socket code along with other messages. I'm not sure
> how, with the
> > noticeProcessor, we would associate notices with specific
> statements or
> > connections.
>
> IIRC, the notice processor is passed a void pointer that you specify
> when you set up the notice hook.
Ahh yes, so it does. Thanks Tom.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc Herbert | 2005-09-07 18:16:03 | Re: Continuing encoding fun.... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-07 14:48:59 | Re: notice handler in libpq-based driver |