Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: No WX_2_6_BRANCH?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>,"Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
Date: 2005-04-26 15:05:38
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E472C510@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org 
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of 
> Andreas Pflug
> Sent: 26 April 2005 15:42
> To: Florian G. Pflug
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
>
> Hm, we usually use a very exact version for snapshots, in 
> this case it 
> would be 2.6.0 release. For development it's ok to use cvs 
> head, but not 
> for daily builds.

Speaking on which, I'm finding that 2.6 will not compile on Slackware 9
or 10 with --enable-mimetype=no. Is this still required (I can't see any
mention of it in the 2.6 README).

Regards, Dave

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Florian G. PflugDate: 2005-04-26 15:23:46
Subject: Re: No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
Previous:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2005-04-26 14:42:23
Subject: Re: No WX_2_6_BRANCH?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group