> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 29 March 2005 16:22
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Andrew Dunstan; greg(dot)landrum(at)gmail(dot)com;
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] writing backend extensions
> using Visual Studio
> > So, a question to anyone who knows, do we really need to ship *all*
> > headers with the installer, or is there a useful subset?
> The reason 'make install-all-headers' went away is that we
> made a policy
> decision to install *all* the headers. I don't think the Windows
> packaging should be second-guessing that. It would be reasonable to
> have an option to install *none* of the headers, for people who aren't
> going to be doing any software development, but if you do install them
> please don't be selective about it.
Ahh, I see the problem - the build script is only pulling in files in
include/, not include/*/ etc. Will have to look at that.
pgsql-hackers-win32 by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2005-03-29 18:30:17|
|Subject: Re: Enhancement: Remove NT/Interactive from Power Users Group|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-03-29 15:22:27|
|Subject: Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio |