| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Karol Szkudlarek" <karol(at)mikronika(dot)com(dot)pl> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 500 times slower |
| Date: | 2005-02-14 13:08:26 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4528B03@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Dave Page
> Sent: 09 February 2005 14:53
> To: Karol Szkudlarek
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] 500 times slower
>
>
> OK, that figures. I (and others I've asked) cannot see a reason not to
> increase the buffers size other than the extra memory that'll be used
> (which is trivial). Anyone disagree before I do so?
SOCK_BUFFER_SIZE increased to 8192 in CVS.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom.Zschockelt | 2005-02-15 06:48:53 | savepoints |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-02-14 12:44:27 | Re: New release |