Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: <ghum(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
Date: 2005-01-21 14:04:01
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E45285AD@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net]
> Sent: 21 January 2005 14:01
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: ghum(at)gmx(dot)net; pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org;
> pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] 300 seconds in
> less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
>
>
>
> We should not be using either of these, should we?
> pg_usleep() is platform
> independent.

True. Attached.

Regards, Dave.

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_autovacuum.c.diff application/octet-stream 697 bytes

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Kirschner 2005-01-21 18:37:12 Invalid username specified
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-01-21 14:00:32 Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-01-21 16:09:21 pg_autovacuum/Win32 Fixes
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-01-21 14:00:32 Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum