Re: Thoughts on the mirroring system etc

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Thoughts on the mirroring system etc
Date: 2005-01-21 08:25:33
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4528590@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net]
> Sent: 21 January 2005 08:24
> To: Dave Page; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] Thoughts on the mirroring system etc
>
> No, I'd go for keeping them all independent. E.g. 2
> independent dynamic
> and 4 independent static. KISS principle, again. And it makes it very
> easy to add more static boxes if need be. Dynamic boxes are bit more
> work, since they need to get db tables set up etc.

Well they can't all be independent - the statics have to mirror from
somewhere.

/D

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-01-21 08:30:16 Re: [DOCS] [BUGS] BUG #1414: DOC - pl/Perl hash tags
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-01-21 08:23:55 Re: Thoughts on the mirroring system etc