> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su]
> Sent: 20 December 2004 22:44
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Joshua D. Drake; PostgreSQL www
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Not wanting to throw a wrench in things
> I think that the mirror selection page is *the* most natural
> place to credit the
> mirrors. Current version of said page provides very little
> info --- it just
> repeats the flag and the country name N times where N is the
> number of that
> country's active mirrors. Giving the mirror owners' names and
> probably links to
> their sites will not hurt here.
Yes, I think I've come to that conclusion now as well.
> All of them have advantages and drawbacks. Option 3) seems
> the easiest to me.
Yes. I hadn't considered that idea. Would obviously save the need to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2004-12-20 23:28:15|
|Subject: Events broken...|
|Previous:||From: Alexey Borzov||Date: 2004-12-20 22:44:11|
|Subject: Re: Not wanting to throw a wrench in things|