> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org]
> Sent: 03 December 2004 13:38
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers; blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr
> Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] New ftp layout
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Dave Page wrote:
> > I'm not sure there are enough different Oss are there? The longest
> > directory at the moment only has 12 entries in it, and even if that
> > doubles I don't think it will be hard to find what you need.
> Mine is nearly the same layout as PostgreSQL.org. Look:
Didn't we just have a discussion about how virtually every release of pg
is structured differently under the binaries directory?
> This seems so untidy to me...
Seems OK to me. I think having an OS/Version structure could prove less
friendly - for example, for the last release, I used slackware 9, for
this one, slackware 9.1 and probably for the next slackware 10, or even
higher. This would have left a structure like:
Similar situations exist for other OS's. That just seems over the top to
Does anyone else share Devrim's concern?
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andreas Pflug||Date: 2004-12-03 13:52:33|
|Subject: Re: RFC: Update wizard|
|Previous:||From: Devrim GUNDUZ||Date: 2004-12-03 13:38:18|
|Subject: Re: New ftp layout|