Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New ODBC driver

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New ODBC driver
Date: 2004-12-01 14:53:02
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527C0E@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com [mailto:markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com] 
> Sent: 01 December 2004 15:02
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] New ODBC driver
> 
> > I don't think it would be realistic to mix the two 
> approaches though - 
> > if only because they couldn't share a single database connection.
> 
> Why is this an issue? Why not create multiple connections?

Efficiency for a start - but what would you use each for? Any
application developer is going to expect everything to use the same
connection - how do you direct a 'SET' statement? What about transaction
isolation?

Regards, Dave.

Responses

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: markwDate: 2004-12-01 15:01:48
Subject: Re: New ODBC driver
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-12-01 14:49:17
Subject: Re: ODBC driver for Windows & future...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group