| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New News Entry |
| Date: | 2004-11-26 20:41:59 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527B56@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org]
> Sent: 26 November 2004 17:14
> To: Marc G. Fournier
> Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New News Entry
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >> Good point, but AFAIK Reply-to header cannot have more
> than 1 email...
> >> Right?
> >
> > Erk, probably not ... how about adding a CC for the
> submitter instead?
> > I know I generally do a 'reply all' when replying, and the CC would
> > let the address come through the list ...
>
> Umm I don't think that CC'ing that mail is a good idea... ?
Can't see why myself. Have I missed something obvious?
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | webmaster | 2004-11-27 22:34:05 | PostgreSQL mirror test report |
| Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-11-26 17:13:38 | Re: New News Entry |