Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Mitch Pirtle" <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>,"PostgreSQL www" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date: 2004-10-28 15:42:57
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306E81@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org] 
> Sent: 28 October 2004 16:19
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Mitch Pirtle; PostgreSQL www; PostgreSQL advocacy
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org 
> Design Proposal
> 
> Stupid question ... do we have somewhere a layout of the long 
> term plan? 
> For instance, eventually we want to merge Gborg -> PgFoundry, 
> so that we have one projects related site ... I believe(?) 
> advocacy is meant to merge into www itself?  And there has 
> been talk of better integrating developer, at least in so far 
> as layout?

Not yet. I've been quoting a basic plan, but that's more like:

1) Build new framework.
2) Apply new design.
3) Merge/overhaul other sites.

1 & 2 got merged when Lukasz presented the design we all accepted, and
have been worked on extensively. 3 has yet to have more than a few words
said about it - I'm cautious to even bring it up right now, as I think
it'll only delay 1 & 2 further.

Regards, Dave

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-28 16:29:50
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-10-28 15:19:29
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-28 16:29:50
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-10-28 15:19:29
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group