Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 libpq : Static Link ?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Oliver D(dot)" <oliver(at)inadd(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 libpq : Static Link ?
Date: 2004-10-04 08:34:26
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306898@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver D. [mailto:oliver(at)inadd(dot)com] 
> Sent: 04 October 2004 09:08
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 libpq : Static Link ?
> 
> 
> Le 4 oct. 04, à 09:37, Dave Page a écrit :
> 
> > Yes, until a week ago, pgAdmin III linked statically against a VC++ 
> > compiled libpq.lib. It sounds to me like the libpq.lib you 
> have is not 
> > actually a static library, but an import library for the DLL.
> >
> > Regards, Dave
> 
> Ah, It should explain why my compiled app is so light ;-) But 
> i've just compiled libpq las friday. So I supposed it was OK.
> Is there a way to know if the compiled ?lib is OK ?
> Or, much more simple for me, is there a way to get a proper, 
> already compiled, libpq.lib ?

The older 2 files at http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/snapshots/postgresql/ are static iirc. The newest (and smallest) is certainly dynamic. They are all in MS format.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Reini UrbanDate: 2004-10-04 11:17:29
Subject: Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore
Previous:From: Oliver D.Date: 2004-10-04 08:08:20
Subject: Re: Win32 libpq : Static Link ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group