From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy |
Date: | 2004-09-30 19:11:01 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306829@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
> Sent: 30 September 2004 18:56
> To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [#14748606]
> comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
>
> People:
>
> E-mail sent to Google. If we don't see any action in a
> couple of days, then
> I'll ask all of our community to e-mail them with requests to
> fix it. That
> will certainly get their attention.
Hi Josh,
In my first response from them, they did suggest that high demand was
one way to get the groups reinstated. And in their defence, they did
answer both times within 2 working days - the second time I even got a
different form letter!
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-09-30 19:15:50 | Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-09-30 19:06:47 | Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy |