Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
Date: 2004-09-30 19:06:47
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306827@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org 
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
> Sent: 30 September 2004 17:47
> To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [#14748606] 
> comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
> 
> Dave,
> 
> > Thank you for the information you provided in your reply. We really 
> > appreciate your feedback, and we'll keep it in mind as we work to 
> > improve Google Groups.
> 
> This looks to me like they cut us off for ulterior reasons 
> and are avoiding 
> the topic.   Does it look that way to anyone else?

Yes. I'm just not sure whether it's because we're a database project, or
because they're trying to wind down groups.google which I can't imagine
makes them a whole lot of cash. Any other theories?

> Is it time to hunt up members of the community who have 
> contacts at google, or start an e-mail petition drive?

Both I say.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-09-30 19:11:01
Subject: Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-09-30 19:02:00
Subject: archives.postgresql.org cleaned up ... and rebuilding ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group