Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Server unreliability

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>,"Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server unreliability
Date: 2004-09-30 07:32:35
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E43067D2@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org 
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Devrim GUNDUZ
> Sent: 29 September 2004 23:03
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List; PostgreSQL advocacy
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Server unreliability
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> >> :-) A Google search box could be better sometimes...
> >
> > Yes, except Google has decided to stop archiving our groups since 
> > September 16.  We reported this on the www list, I think.  I think 
> > they had the best archive interface, and now it is gone.  
> Take a look:
> >
> > 	
> > 
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&c2coff=1&group=comp
> > .databases.postgresql.hackers
> 
> Dave has contacted with Google, and I'm sure that they'll 
> solve this problem. See:

It's not looking good. I think we're going to need a mass of complaints
form the users.

Regards, Dave

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-09-30 07:49:58
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Infrastructure TODO list
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-09-30 07:30:13
Subject: Re: Server unreliability

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group