Re: "Operation on non-socket" analysis

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Operation on non-socket" analysis
Date: 2004-09-23 08:02:20
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306632@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-win32-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-win32-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf
> Of Magnus Hagander
> Sent: 22 September 2004 12:57
> To: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [pgsql-hackers-win32] "Operation on non-socket" analysis
>
> Does anybody have any further ideas on this subject?

Nice catch. I'm dubious about nasty workarounds to fix other ppls broken
software however (especially when things like SSL don't work yet :-p ).
I would vote for simply detecting the problem and pointing people at
some documentation on it's cause.

Regards, Dave

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reinaldo Picone 2004-09-23 15:50:44 Documentation
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2004-09-23 07:35:37 Re: installer automation