Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2004-08-25 07:51:25
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net] 
> Sent: 24 August 2004 17:07
> To: Dave Page; Andrew Dunstan
> Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [pgsql-hackers-win32]
> I think it's better to call uor named pipe. That way we'll 
> find out if it's actually a postmaster of ours or a different 
> process alltogether there.

I'm not sure that's a good idea. The function is there to emulate the
unix kill() which doesn't care what the process is. Changing the code as
you suggest could cause confusionon Windows if someone uses kill() for
other purposes.

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-08-25 07:54:43
Subject: Re:
Previous:From: Tim PenheyDate: 2004-08-24 21:03:42
Subject: pg_dump and pg_restore in batch scripts

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group