From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ODBC version and Unicode |
Date: | 2004-07-10 23:42:26 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40C392F@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> Sent: 10 July 2004 23:37
> To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [ODBC] ODBC version and Unicode
>
> Dave,
>
> in the release of 07.03.0209 you said that you consider ODBC
> version 0x0300 and Unicode on to be the only supported
> variant of the driver from now on.
Hi Peter,
Yes, we've had the 0x0300 Unicode version as a beta for a few releases
now - it's had about as much exposure as it's gonna get without being
made the only supported version.
> The Unix build still
> builds the 0x0250 and Unicode off version by default. I
> assume all this conditional code should be fixed and removed?
> The 0x0300 variant doesn't even build successfully currently.
Yes, I've been meaning to throw that one out to the list to see if one
of our recent volunteers wants to take a look at it (unless you
particularly want to do it?).
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-11 19:48:38 | Re: ODBC version and Unicode |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-10 22:37:20 | ODBC version and Unicode |