Re: wx status

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wx status
Date: 2004-07-05 09:22:52
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40C3856@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 05 July 2004 10:13
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wx status
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >>
> >>984864 gtk notebook page style
> >>984861 styles of combobox/listbox items
> >>984859 wxStaticText c'tor uses SetLabel
> >>984858 InheritAttributes in wxWindow::PostCreation
> >>984853 Prevent overriding individual font
> >>984852 Typo in gtk/toplevel.cpp
> >>
> >>Hope this separation makes committing easier and faster.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >So what's the official line at the moment? Use wx CVS tip with those
> >patches, on GTK, or are we going to keep rolling our own version?
> >Personally I prefer the former...
> >
>
> I'm trying to have all patches in wx cvs. Actually, two of
> them are already committed (..52 and ..53),

Wahoo!

> and in the
> absence of Vaclav (on
> holiday) I contacted Ron hoping he'd finalize. Then, we can
> pinpoint a cvs version that's known good for us.

Even more Wahoo!

> And we can continue on OSX support. Currently, the correct
> version to use at the moment is wx cvs.

Yes, I'd like to get that one sorted. Anyone wanna post me an iBook to
play with? :-)

Regards Dave

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2004-07-05 09:29:15 Re: wx status
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-07-05 09:13:00 Re: wx status