Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer)

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer)
Date: 2004-07-02 10:14:10
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40C3828@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net] 
> Sent: 02 July 2004 10:06
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer)
> 
> Am Freitag, 2. Juli 2004 10:45 schrieben Sie:
> > I've forwarded this patch to the list for review before 
> it's applied 
> > (I don't use IODBC).
> 
> If one uses iODBC then the include files are picked up from 
> the installed version of iODBC.  The files iodbc.h, isql.h, 
> etc. in the source tree are sort of obsolete.  They are only 
> used for the "neither unixODBC nor iODBC" 
> version of the driver, which is quite useless.

In which case, should they be removed to force the user to install
either iODBC or unixODBC first?

Regards, Dave.

Responses

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-07-02 10:24:49
Subject: Re: Volunteer psqlODBC Developer Required
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-07-02 09:05:37
Subject: Re: 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group