From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Late night problems |
Date: | 2004-06-28 14:33:32 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40C377E@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 28 June 2004 15:22
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Late night problems
>
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > I don't see this from .uk. In fact, search.postgresql.org has just
> > recently been moved to new hardware in .au which offers far greater
> > performance - for example, I just searched then entire database for
> > 'referential integrity' and saw the results page, including
> all images
> > and ads in about 3 seconds.
>
> The search seems fast, but I see no results, just a blank
> page :-( In the past this has usually been because of bad
> HTML, eg an unclosed <table> definition. Could someone run
> an HTML validator over the output?
John, can you take a look at the archives template please?
Tom; is the main search page working OK? It didn't seem to have any
close tag errors like the archives.
(http://search.postgresql.org/www.search)
From archives:
Line 490, column 8: end tag for "TABLE" omitted, but its declaration
does not permit this
</CENTER>
Line 13, column 0: start tag was here
<TABLE WIDTH="700">
Line 492, column 7: "HEAD" not finished but document ended
</HTML>
Line 492, column 7: "HTML" not finished but document ended
</HTML>
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-28 14:41:10 | Re: Late night problems |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-28 14:22:25 | Re: Late night problems |