Re: time to move to the new code

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: time to move to the new code
Date: 2004-08-14 17:31:51
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B3B9@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

None that I know of - it just needs the content to be sync'ed, and for someone with some spare time to look at it (not me I'm afraid - but I'll be all finished on my DS in November if that helps :-) ).

Regards, Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Robert Treat
Sent: Sat 8/14/2004 6:06 AM
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [pgsql-www] time to move to the new code

I think it is time to move to the new code for www. The biggest argument
against the idea was the desire some folks had to implement a new design
along with the new code. Well, the design doesn't get done and the code gets
more out of synch as maintainance on the live site rolls on, so I think we
need to bite the bullet and move to the new code. Once it is in place we
should be able to make deisng changes much easier anyway, after all that is
part of the point of the new code. Are there any open items that would
prevent us from making the switch?

--
Robert Treat
Build A Better Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-08-14 18:01:08 Re: FW: [ pginstaller-Bugs-1000056 ] DLL not found
Previous Message Justin Clift 2004-08-14 16:58:03 Re: FW: [ pginstaller-Bugs-1000056 ] DLL not found