Re: Admin functions contrib

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Admin functions contrib
Date: 2004-07-30 19:20:14
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B39F@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Fri 7/30/2004 5:34 PM
To: Dave Page
Cc: Tom Lane; Andreas Pflug; PostgreSQL Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Admin functions contrib

> Ouch, that is a powerful argument! The big problem is that we are
> designing features a month after feature freeze. Not that the ideas
> weren't around before feature freeze, but they are still not solid from
> a community agreement perspective. Let's get the logging working and
> then figure out what to do, OK?

Sounds good to me :-)

Regards, Dave

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-07-30 20:55:48 win32 timezone map
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-30 17:31:55 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] win32 crash in initdb