Re: About docbot

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <ads(at)pgug(dot)de>
Subject: Re: About docbot
Date: 2006-10-10 07:31:39
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40176D3F4@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
> Sent: 10 October 2006 03:17
> To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Cc: Dave Page; Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum; Magnus Hagander;
> david(at)fetter(dot)org; gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net; jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com; ads(at)pgug(dot)de
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] About docbot
>
>
> Dave, whats your opinion on moving the database completly onto the
> postgresql.org server and doing away with the slony
> replication bit (which
> seems like overkill imho) We could then grant access to bots
> that need it or
> provide a full fledged web api to people who want to
> interface with it. The
> one thing I am wondering is that this would in theory be a
> higher load than
> the current website gives, since all requests would run
> through the db.

That does sound like a better idea to me... though it should go on the
search server, not borg because it'll generally be used with the search
engine. I assume the load is likely to be far less than the GIN/Tsearch
engine that Magnus is currently developing?

Regards Dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-10 19:33:31 Re: Deployment Case Study Presentations
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-10 03:06:39 Re: About docbot