Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: A counter productive conversation about search.

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>,"PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A counter productive conversation about search.
Date: 2006-08-29 14:54:50
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154C8BF@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com] 
> Sent: 29 August 2006 15:32
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: John Hansen; PostgreSQL WWW
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] A counter productive conversation 
> about search.
> 
> 
> > ServerWeight 100
> > Server http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/
> > ServerWeight 50
> > Server http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/
> > 
> > I did get shot down as well though - iirc it was Oleg who was
> > essentially saying that the search engine should not have 
> any knowledge
> > of the site beyond what it crawled.
> 
> That won't work in aspseek. I looked into that too. It applies the 
> weight to the whole site.

Yeah, I was confusing my self with options in Mnogosearch (which is very
similar in many ways).

Regards, Dave.

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2006-08-29 15:07:56
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-08-29 14:54:10
Subject: Re: A counter productive conversation about search.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group