Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Best high availability solution ?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Arnaud Lesauvage" <thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
Cc: "Tino Wildenhain" <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>,<pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Date: 2006-05-31 11:42:21
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4013885CD@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnaud Lesauvage [mailto:thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr] 
> Sent: 31 May 2006 12:33
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Tino Wildenhain; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Best high availability solution ?
> 
> Dave Page a écrit :
> > Yes - the DNS method would work, but you might run into 
> caching issues
> > requiring the users to reboot or do a 'ipconfig /flushdns' 
> before they
> > see the change.
> 
> Yes, but I am not a very nice adminsitrator, and when there is any 
> problem with a datawase, my users HAVE to reboot ! ;-)
> So that might just be fine !

Ah, but wasn't this intended for when you are not there standing over them with a bat?

:-)

Regards, Dave.

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-05-31 11:42:49
Subject: Re: Problems posting messages in this mailing-list?
Previous:From: Philippe LangDate: 2006-05-31 11:32:56
Subject: Problems posting messages in this mailing-list?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group